Memeing Naturalism: No Problem With Determinism

Memeing Naturalism: No Problem With Determinism

Why Darwinist Materialism Is Wrong | The New Republic

Why Darwinist Materialism Is Wrong | The New Republic

Interview: Russell Blackford on Atheism, Philosophy and Morality - Rational Hub BlogsRational Hub Blogs

Interview: Russell Blackford on Atheism, Philosophy and Morality - Rational Hub BlogsRational Hub Blogs

Stephen Law: Review of Bede Rundle's "Why there is Something rather than Nothing"

Stephen Law: Review of Bede Rundle's "Why there is Something rather than Nothing"

Choice and creativity

Choice and creativity

From nothing, nothing comes | Leukhtam

From nothing, nothing comes | Leukhtam

Moral Naturalism (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)

Moral Naturalism (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)

          Besides the  God of the scientific gap exists the one of the explanatory one per Lamberth's God of the explanatory gap argument. Theists can grant that  why, We don't need Him as the answer to why particular matters exist but instead as why do things act as they do.That is the intent behind  Aquinas' five ways and others' cosmological arguments- the overall explanation- the sufficient reason.

           But that amounts to God did it which means He does whatever He does, a tautologous pseudo-answer!It implies divine intent for events, whilst science finds none as the Coyne-Mayr-Lamberth teleonomic argument explains.

        Besides this argument, rules also the Lamberth ignotic-Ockham argument, the Flew-Lamberth the presumption of naturalism and Aquinas' own the superfluity argument that boomerangs on his five failed ways.  

Two Arguments for Evolution by Rational Selection

Two Arguments for Evolution by Rational Selection

NeuroLogica Blog » More on God of the Gaps

NeuroLogica Blog » More on God of the Gaps